From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10681 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2003 18:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10663 invoked by uid 71); 1 Apr 2003 18:26:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030401182601.10662.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: c/8730: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Cannot compile C function inside other C function Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/8730; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: Steven Bosscher Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ilgis@num.uni-sb.de, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, info@ilghiz.com, mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: c/8730: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Cannot compile C function inside other C function Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:22:29 -0800 On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:08:39AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8730 > > I cannot reproduce this PR anymore. The testcase, > > void foo() > { > void* bar(int i, int A[1][i]) { return A[0]; } > } > > compilers fine for me with today's CVS (3.3 20030401). Could it be > that this PR got fixed with Mark Mitchell's patch for 9936? > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00018.html) My regression hunting scripts verify that this patch fixes the problem. I used the original larger test case on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Janis