From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32476-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14618 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2003 02:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14604 invoked by uid 71); 2 Apr 2003 02:16:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 02:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030402021601.14603.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/5247: [2003-01-22]ICE on default parameter in constructor which is reference to class
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/5247; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/5247: [2003-01-22]ICE on default parameter in constructor which is reference to class
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:07:23 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=5247
 
 The testcase compiles on my 2.95:
 
 $ g++-2 -v
 Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10/specs
 gcc version 2.95.3-10 (cygwin special)
 
 Can somebody double-check? If it really works with 2.95, this is a
 regression and should be flagged as such.
 
 Giovanni Bajo