From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27835 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2003 16:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27814 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2003 16:27:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 16:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030403162756.27813.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10305: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in int_for_mode X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in int_for_mode State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 3 16:27:56 2003 State-Changed-Why: Same problem as 10201/10202. I'll raise their priority instead. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10305