public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> To: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: other/4957: #pragma pack(1) ... #pragma pack(4) does not restore the original alignment Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 19:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030403195601.30513.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR other/4957; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> To: igusarov@akella.com Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/4957: #pragma pack(1) ... #pragma pack(4) does not restore the original alignment Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:52:11 -0600 (CST) In article <3E89B05E.4070302@akella.com>, "Igor A. Goussarov"<igusarov@akella.com> writes: > [...] And since the .i files are too big, I didn't had the patience to > reduce them to a pure bug-generating code. > I guess that it might be a very stupid coding mistake, but it is > unlikely... > Well, I don't insist on keeping this bug open if you feel it > shouldn't. I'll download the weekly snapshot of mainline gcc and try to > build it to see how it behaves. gcc web site warns that not all of the > snapshots might even build, can you suggest me which snapshot is working > enough to try my code with it? > Thanks again for your time! If you are working with FreeBSD, then most mainline snapshots should work fine for you. However, I see that we aren't making snapshots of mainline at the moment. Perhaps wait until after gcc 3.3 is released if you can easily obtain CVS mainline (which should work ~9/10 random updates just fine on FreeBSD). If this bug/issue can be seen with mainline, I will take an active interest in: fixing it, explaining it to someone that can, or explaining how the test case effectively violates ODR. Regards, Loren
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-03 19:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-04-03 19:56 Loren James Rittle [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-03-26 9:55 ljrittle 2001-11-21 5:16 igusarov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030403195601.30513.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).