From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32549-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11637 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 00:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11620 invoked by uid 71); 4 Apr 2003 00:36:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030404003601.11619.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Garen <garen@garen.net>
Subject: Re: other/10301: Side effects of architecture specific flags are not documented.
Reply-To: Garen <garen@garen.net>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/10301; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garen <garen@garen.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   hubicka@gcc.gnu.org, garen@garen.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: other/10301: Side effects of architecture specific flags are not documented.
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:35:46 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10301
 
 The part I was referring to inparticular was what the -march settings turn on.  
 For example, -march=pentium4 turns on -msse2.  All of those things aren't 
 mentioned anywhere in the manual:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386%20and%20x86-64%20Options