From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32559-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18181 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 05:09:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18150 invoked by uid 48); 4 Apr 2003 05:09:41 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 05:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030404050941.18149.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bobsummerwill@ea.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  jason@gcc.gnu.org
From: jason@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: jason@gcc.gnu.org, bobsummerwill@ea.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10175: -Wunreachable-code doesn't work for single lines
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Old Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] -Wunreachable-code broken
New Synopsis: -Wunreachable-code doesn't work for single lines

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->open
State-Changed-By: jason
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr  4 05:09:41 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    I've fixed the regression which broke the warning for 
    multiple-line blocks in 3.3 and on the trunk, but the 
    original limitation of not working with single lines 
    remains.  This seems to have been a deliberate choice when 
    the code was first written, presumably to reduce the number
    of false positives.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10175