From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32563-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10080 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 10:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10051 invoked by uid 71); 4 Apr 2003 10:16:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030404101601.10050.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: aph@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: java/8457: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE in generate_bytecode_insns,
 at java/jcf-write.c:1850
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/8457; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, tjmather@maxmind.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	aph@gcc.gnu.org, martin_aliger@email.cz, aph@redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/8457: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE in generate_bytecode_insns,
 at java/jcf-write.c:1850
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 12:06:35 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8457
 
 A patch was applied and the PR is in feedback state.  Why?  According
 to the changelog, the bug fixed wasn't fixed completely by the patch.  Is
 it still a regression, or have the remaining always just been there???
 
 Greetz
 Steven