From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32565-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16707 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 10:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16680 invoked by uid 71); 4 Apr 2003 10:26:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030404102600.16677.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: aph@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: java/8457: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE in generate_bytecode_insns,
 at java/jcf-write.c:1850
Reply-To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/8457; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   tjmather@maxmind.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, aph@gcc.gnu.org,
   martin_aliger@email.cz
Subject: Re: java/8457: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE in generate_bytecode_insns,
 at java/jcf-write.c:1850
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:17:12 +0100 (BST)

 Steven Bosscher writes:
  > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8457
  > 
  > A patch was applied and the PR is in feedback state.  Why?  According
  > to the changelog, the bug fixed wasn't fixed completely by the patch.  Is
  > it still a regression, or have the remaining always just been there???
 
 It's no longer a regression.  The inner class buges have always been
 there.  I closed the PR.
 
 Andrew.