From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4931 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 17:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4914 invoked by uid 71); 4 Apr 2003 17:56:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030404175601.4913.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/4933: [2003-01-13]tree_list not supported by dump_expr Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/4933; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/4933: [2003-01-13]tree_list not supported by dump_expr Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:47:34 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=4933 Redux: -------------------------------------------- template struct Foo; template T makeT(); template struct Bar { typedef Foo < sizeof((makeT(), makeT())) > Type; }; ---------------------------------------------- pr4933.cpp:14: sorry, unimplemented: `tree_list' not supported by dump_expr pr4933.cpp:14: sorry, unimplemented: `tree_list' not supported by dump_expr It's now easy to see that GCC simply doesn't like the comma operator in that context. Confirmed with 2.95, 3.2 and 3.3 20030401. Giovanni Bajo