From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32594-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16185 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2003 22:06:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16172 invoked by uid 71); 4 Apr 2003 22:06:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 22:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030404220600.16171.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: rakdver@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Subject: Re: optimization/10312: optimizer creates wrong code for loop
Reply-To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10312; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Peter van Hoof <p.van-hoof@qub.ac.uk>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10312: optimizer creates wrong code for loop
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 00:00:04 +0200

 > >     Does passing -fno-gcse-sm cure the problem?
 >
 > Yes, that cures the problem.
 
 Ok. The regression was detected this morning on Sparc through the failure of
 
 FAIL: gcc.dg/20030324-1.c execution test
 
 See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00254.html
 
 I'm going to assign the PR to Zdenek.
 
 Thanks for the quick feedback.
 
 -- 
 Eric Botcazou