From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32608-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1985 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1969 invoked by uid 71); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030406002600.1968.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: inline-asm/8808: [3.2/3.3 regression] Internal compiler error
 in extract_constrain_insn_cached
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/8808; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	ebuddington@wesleyan.edu, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz,
	mark@codesourcery.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: inline-asm/8808: [3.2/3.3 regression] Internal compiler error
 in extract_constrain_insn_cached
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 02:15:25 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8808
 
 This PR is probably very hard to fix if possible at all.  It should
 not be high priority IMHO.  Maybe it should even be closed with
 a "don't do that" kind of remark.  Agree?
 
 Greetz
 Steven