From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2014 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1986 invoked by uid 71); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030406002600.1984.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Steven Bosscher Subject: Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function Reply-To: Steven Bosscher X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10180; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Steven Bosscher To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, wwieser@gmx.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 02:16:24 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10180 2.95 didn't have the tree-inliner, right? So this is probably a tree inliner bug.