From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32611-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2114 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2065 invoked by uid 71); 6 Apr 2003 00:26:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030406002601.2006.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/10024 [3.3 regression] [HP-PA] inline optimization
 ICE
Reply-To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10024; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  tausq@debian.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10024 [3.3 regression] [HP-PA] inline optimization
 ICE
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0800

 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
 >>         * cfgrtl.c (force_nonfallthru_and_redirect): If e is the edge
 >>         we want, use it.
 >
 > Yes, this is ok for 3.3.
 
 Checked in.  I have also checked the test case in as
 gcc.c-torture/compile/20030405-1.c on both the 3.3 branch and the
 mainline.
 
 zw