From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19442 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2003 11:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19427 invoked by uid 71); 6 Apr 2003 11:56:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 11:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030406115601.19425.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: inline-asm/8808: [3.2/3.3 regression] Internal compiler error in extract_constrain_insn_cached Reply-To: Jan Hubicka X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/8808; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Hubicka To: Steven Bosscher Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ebuddington@wesleyan.edu, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz, mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: inline-asm/8808: [3.2/3.3 regression] Internal compiler error in extract_constrain_insn_cached Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:53:26 +0200 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8808 > > This PR is probably very hard to fix if possible at all. It should > not be high priority IMHO. Maybe it should even be closed with > a "don't do that" kind of remark. Agree? I've already fixed this bug I believe by changing the error message, but forgot to close it. Will double check. Honza > > Greetz > Steven > >