From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32712-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8297 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 15:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8283 invoked by uid 71); 7 Apr 2003 15:36:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030407153601.8282.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/7875
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7875; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7875
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:32:27 -0500 (CDT)

 In fact, this is a regression in 3.2, 3.3 and mainline. It worked in 2.95.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/