From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20100 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 18:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20070 invoked by uid 71); 7 Apr 2003 18:56:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030407185601.20069.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: optimization/10339 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10339; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/10339 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:46:32 -0500 (CDT) Actually, the use of memcmp didn't happen in 3.0, so this is a regression. I don't have 3.3 or mainline installed on this platform, so can't say anything about the problem in these branches. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/