public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 19:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030407193601.2148.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --] The following reply was made to PR optimization/10339; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> To: Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com> Cc: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>, Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:24:46 +0200 Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com> writes: |> > I suspect the extra byte read is actually not relevant for the result, |> > and because of alignment, gcc knows the second problem cannot occur, |> > but I have neither a SPARC nor SPARC knowledge to test that. |> > |> |> Actually if you make the compare string longer you can get it |> to look at an arbitrary number of bytes passed the allocated part, |> so I think this could fault if you set it up right. Also in |> the original problem, the first argument was not allocated locally |> so the compiler would have no idea how big or what its alignment |> was. (In fact it was in a loop comparing strings from an array.) Could you please provide a test case that actually shows the problem? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-07 19:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-04-07 19:36 Andreas Schwab [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-04-08 1:56 Hans-Peter Nilsson 2003-04-07 21:46 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 21:46 Andreas Schwab 2003-04-07 21:36 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 21:26 Andreas Schwab 2003-04-07 20:56 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 20:06 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 20:06 Andreas Schwab 2003-04-07 19:56 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 19:36 Falk Hueffner 2003-04-07 19:06 Falk Hueffner 2003-04-07 19:06 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 18:16 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-04-07 17:06 Michael Ubell 2003-04-07 16:48 bangerth 2003-04-07 16:16 ubell
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030407193601.2148.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=schwab@suse.de \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).