public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 19:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030407193601.2148.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10339; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com>
Cc: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>,
	Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:24:46 +0200

 Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com> writes:
 
 |> > I suspect the extra byte read is actually not relevant for the result,
 |> > and because of alignment, gcc knows the second problem cannot occur,
 |> > but I have neither a SPARC nor SPARC knowledge to test that.
 |> > 
 |> 
 |> Actually if you make the compare string longer you can get it
 |> to look at an arbitrary number of bytes passed the allocated part,
 |> so I think this could fault if you set it up right.  Also in
 |> the original problem, the first argument was not allocated locally
 |> so the compiler would have no idea how big or what its alignment
 |> was.  (In fact it was in a loop comparing strings from an array.)
 
 Could you please provide a test case that actually shows the problem?
 
 Andreas.
 
 -- 
 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
 SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
 Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
 "And now for something completely different."


             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-07 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-07 19:36 Andreas Schwab [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-08  1:56 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2003-04-07 21:46 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 21:46 Andreas Schwab
2003-04-07 21:36 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 21:26 Andreas Schwab
2003-04-07 20:56 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 20:06 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 20:06 Andreas Schwab
2003-04-07 19:56 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 19:36 Falk Hueffner
2003-04-07 19:06 Falk Hueffner
2003-04-07 19:06 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 18:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-04-07 17:06 Michael Ubell
2003-04-07 16:48 bangerth
2003-04-07 16:16 ubell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030407193601.2148.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).