From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32736-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26501 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 20:16:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26483 invoked by uid 71); 7 Apr 2003 20:16:00 -0000
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 20:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030407201600.26482.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: target/10340: Vararg functions, -fPIC and invalid assembly on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Reply-To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/10340; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
To: Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: target/10340: Vararg functions, -fPIC and invalid assembly on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:06:20 +0200

 > Hi,
 > 
 > This bug seems to be related to:
 > 
 >   Thu Apr  3 18:57:19 CEST 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
 > 
 >         * i386.c (print_operand): Do not bypass output_addr_const at flag_pic.
 > 
 > Since the testcase is so small, I'll repeat it here:
 > 
 > --8<--
 > static struct { int i; int j; } s;
 > 
 > int fnV (int, ...);
 > void fnA (void)
 > {
 >   fnV(s.j, fnV(s.j));
 > }
 > --8<--
 > 
 >   $ gcc -fPIC -O2 -c foo.c
 >   /tmp/cc4zCzUj.s: Assembler messages:
 >   /tmp/cc4zCzUj.s:12: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `lea'
 
 I've sent a fix for this minute ago.
 
 Honza
 > 
 > - Hari
 > -- 
 > Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu