From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6567 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 20:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6539 invoked by uid 71); 7 Apr 2003 20:36:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 20:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030407203600.6538.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c/10339 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10339; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10339 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:28:37 -0500 (CDT) > > PS: Again, my interest is just to know whether this is a regression also > > on 3.3 and mainline, but if you should want to fix it then... > > Does the same problem (if there is a problem) not happen on x86 too? The x86 backend doesn't seem to use memcmp in this case (maybe it does for different values of string lengths, etc, but I haven't checked that). W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/