From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32746-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4872 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 21:46:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4845 invoked by uid 71); 7 Apr 2003 21:46:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030407214601.4844.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code
Reply-To: Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10339; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Ubell <ubell@mindspring.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Timothy C Prince <tprince@myrealbox.com>, 
 falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de,  bangerth@ices.utexas.edu, 
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10339: strncmp generates imPure code
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:43:21 -0700

 I guess memcmp could do anything it wanted so long as it
 does not fetch more than N bytes.  Ok you win.  Or maybe I do?