From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17246 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 19:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17214 invoked by uid 71); 9 Apr 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030409192600.17213.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Berger David-MGI2063 Subject: RE: optimization/10362: Optimization with constant shifts and com pares fails on MIPS and x86 - probably all Reply-To: Berger David-MGI2063 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10362; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Berger David-MGI2063 To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: RE: optimization/10362: Optimization with constant shifts and com pares fails on MIPS and x86 - probably all Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:19:25 -0700 I'd like to admend this bug report: it does the same thing on the x86 as well, which indicates it is a front-end bug. David. -----Original Message----- From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 11:46 AM To: David Berger Subject: Re: optimization/10362: Optimization with constant shifts and compares fails on MIPS Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `optimization/10362'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: optimization >Responsible: unassigned >Synopsis: Optimization with constant shifts and compares fails on MIPS >Arrival-Date: Wed Apr 09 18:46:00 UTC 2003