From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28590 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2003 02:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28574 invoked by uid 71); 10 Apr 2003 02:36:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030410023601.28573.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/7906: Templated class with nested non-templated class having an operator() fails to compile Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7906; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" Subject: Re: c++/7906: Templated class with nested non-templated class having an operator() fails to compile Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 04:34:22 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=7906 Reconfirmed on 2.95 -> 3.3 20030401. The code does look legit to me in fact. Can anybody test it with the mainline? It really looks like a parsing bug. Giovanni Bajo