Re: c++/4672: [2003-01-03]Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded template functions.

["Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/4672; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<sven@programmingresearch.ie>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nathan@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/4672: [2003-01-03]Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded template functions.
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 05:02:10 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=4672
 
 This is a 3.2/3.3 regression with respect to 2.95, where the code compiled
 correctly. Redux is:
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 template<class T, class U> inline void Foo(U & from) {}
 template<class T, class U> inline void Foo(U * from) {}
 
 struct A
 {
   void foo () const
   {
    Foo<int>(this);
   }
 };
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 pr4672.cpp: In member function `void A::foo() const':
 pr4672.cpp:8: error: call of overloaded `Foo(const A* const)' is ambiguous
 pr4672.cpp:1: error: candidates are: void Foo(U&) [with T = int, U = const
 A* const]
 pr4672.cpp:2: error:                 void Foo(U*) [with T = int, U = const
 A]
 
 Notice that if you remove the (useless) template paramater T from Foo(), the
 code compiles correctly. I would flag this regression as quite serious, too.
 Please, somebody check it on 3.4 and see if it's still present (mainline is
 still broken for cygwin).
 
 Giovanni Bajo