From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32940-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18891 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2003 19:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18849 invoked by uid 71); 11 Apr 2003 19:06:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030411190600.18848.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: c++/1687: Extreme compile time regression from 2.95.2
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/1687; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kelley.cook@home.com,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1687: Extreme compile time regression from 2.95.2
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:57:21 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1687
 
 I cannot reproduce this with:
 - gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3 20030407 (prerelease) or
 - gcc-3.4 (GCC) 3.4 20030411 (experimental).
 
 Both give subsecond compile times.  Which is particularly nice
 because it means that we can say at least one positive thing about
 compile time performance of 3.3 (this is a regression that is not
 marked as one for some reason...).
 
 Wolfgang, you were the last to re-confirm the PR, do you still
 see it?
 
 Greetz
 Steven