From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13790 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2003 01:31:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13759 invoked by uid 48); 12 Apr 2003 01:31:32 -0000 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030412013132.13758.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jaf@lcsaudio.com, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jaf@lcsaudio.com, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10300: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] use of array-new (nothrow) in segfaults on NULL return X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00538.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] use of array-new (nothrow) in segfaults on NULL return Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel Responsible-Changed-By: mmitchel Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 12 01:31:32 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Working on a fix. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10300