From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6625 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2003 17:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6544 invoked by uid 71); 13 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030413175600.6543.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org Subject: c++/10300 Reply-To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10300; it has been noted by GNATS. From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: c++/10300 Date: 13 Apr 2003 17:49:39 -0000 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org 2003-04-13 17:49:39 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog init.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init: new5.C Log message: PR c++/10300 * init.c (build_new_1): Correct logic for checking whether the return value from the allocation function was zero. PR c++/10300 * g++.dg/init/new5.C: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.3076.2.103&r2=1.3076.2.104 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/init.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.299.2.4&r2=1.299.2.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.2261.2.138&r2=1.2261.2.139 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new5.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1