From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26251 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2003 17:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26195 invoked by uid 71); 14 Apr 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030414172600.26194.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/10401: [3.3/3.4 regression] Seg fault with "-pedantic -Wunreachable-code" Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00630.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10401; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: "Gabriel Dos Reis" , , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10401: [3.3/3.4 regression] Seg fault with "-pedantic -Wunreachable-code" Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:21:42 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=10401 I think it's even worse: ------------------------ struct Foo { Foo() throw() {} }; Foo f; ------------------------ pr10401.cpp: In constructor `Foo::Foo()': pr10401.cpp:3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, Confirmed on 3.3 and 3.4, I don't have 3.2.3pre. Giovanni Bajo