public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Jacobs <grant.jacobs@clear.net.nz> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c/10411: Why is __STDC_VERSION__ not defined? (gcc 2.96 & 3.1) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030415225601.16617.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c/10411; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Grant Jacobs <grant.jacobs@clear.net.nz> To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10411: Why is __STDC_VERSION__ not defined? (gcc 2.96 & 3.1) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:56:51 +1200 Yes, you're quite right... sorry. For some reason I thought that ISO amendment 1 (i.e. 1994) would be the default :( (Never assume and all that...) I didn't think that the default would be set so far back! After all 1994 is all of 9 years ago and I'd have naively thought that the dust would have well and truly settled on any issues with that amendment by now -- ? While I'm writing, is there any sense for 'gcc --version' to also output the default version of the language(s), as I presume this occasionally changes. At some point, surely, you'll bring the default up to a more recent standard...? Grant At 8:29 PM +0100 15/4/03, Neil Booth wrote: >grant.jacobs@clear.net.nz wrote:- > >> Why is __STDC_VERSION__ not defined? I've tried this in gcc 2.96 & 3.1: >> >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> #if defined __STDC_VERSION__ >> #define avail "yes!" >> #else >> #define avail "nope" >> #endif >> >> int main() >> { >> printf( "__STDC__ == '%d'\n", __STDC__ ) ; >> printf( "Is __STDC_VERSION__ defined: %s\n", avail ) ; >> } >> >> >> and it results in: >> >> >> __STDC__ == '1' > > Is __STDC_VERSION__ defined: nope > >You're compiling in C89 mode I imagine. > >Neil. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Grant Jacobs grant.jacobs@clear.net.nz McAndrew Bay, Dunedin, ph. +64 3 476 1820 NEW ZEALAND. fax. +64 3 476 1825
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 22:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-04-15 22:56 Grant Jacobs [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-04-15 23:01 neil 2003-04-15 19:36 Neil Booth 2003-04-15 11:46 grant.jacobs
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030415225601.16617.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=grant.jacobs@clear.net.nz \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).