From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10294 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 08:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10280 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2003 08:16:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030416081600.10279.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Christian Joensson Subject: Re: target/9628: [sparc] ICE in gcc 3.4 20030203 sparc{64,}-linux: bfd/linker.c:2738: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand Reply-To: Christian Joensson X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00748.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/9628; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Christian Joensson To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/9628: [sparc] ICE in gcc 3.4 20030203 sparc{64,}-linux: bfd/linker.c:2738: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:12:04 +0200 On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:34:50AM +0200, c.christian.joensson@telia.com wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:41:42AM -0000, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > > Synopsis: [sparc] ICE in gcc 3.4 20030203 sparc{64,}-linux: bfd/linker.c:2738: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > > State-Changed-By: ebotcazou > > State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 10:41:42 2003 > > State-Changed-Why: > > We need a preprocessed testcase (see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html) > > and a small one is even better. > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9628 > well, it seems as thoug this problem has gone away, for me at least. i did a bootstrap/build of gcc 3.4 20030413 (experimental), posted the test suite results of *that* as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-04/msg00965.html. installed *that* gcc and used *that* gcc to bootstrap/build gcc cvs head right now. it passes the linker.c problem and is moving forward. So, I'd say close this PR... Cheers, /ChJ