From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32630 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 18:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32606 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2003 18:26:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030416182601.32605.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Merrill Subject: Re: c++/10247: [3.4 regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:636 Reply-To: Jason Merrill X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00769.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10247; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Merrill To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, larsbj@lyx.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10247: [3.4 regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:636 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:22:18 +0100 On 16 Apr 2003 18:07:34 -0000, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: > Jason, shouldn't we add a testcase for the failure? Sure. My patch was in response to a failure in an existing test on the tree-ssa branch, but adding this test seems reasonable. Would you? Jason