From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24722 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24701 invoked by uid 71); 17 Apr 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030417141600.24700.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Eric Botcazou Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some java problem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 Reply-To: Eric Botcazou X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00804.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10007; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric Botcazou To: Gerhard Heinzel Cc: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, , , Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some java problem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:15:15 +0200 > Maybe yes. But for this installation, I started in an new "objdir" > and did a "make clean", if I remember correctly. Any suggestions what I > could test here? Hmm... if the objdir was really new, you couldn't have done a 'make clean' since there is no Makefile :-) My wild guess is that the objdir was not new and you previously built with Java support enabled. Then you did 'make clean', re-configured but some scraps were left. I tested that this morning (even with 'make distclean') and I got a failure when building libjava too. I presume you managed to build the compiler anyway, using another fresh new objdir? -- Eric Botcazou