From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27964 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2003 14:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27945 invoked by uid 48); 17 Apr 2003 14:24:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030417142448.27944.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jonathan.sambrook@dsvr.co.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jonathan.sambrook@dsvr.co.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10426: -O2 messes with ordering of pointer dereferencing X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: -O2 messes with ordering of pointer dereferencing State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 17 14:24:48 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug. The compiler is allowed to evaluate the side-effect operator in any order in *p++ = tolower(*p). http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10426