public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Heinzel <ghh@mpq.mpg.de> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some java problem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:26:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030417142600.28698.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10007; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gerhard Heinzel <ghh@mpq.mpg.de> To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Cc: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some java problem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:19:00 +0200 (CEST) On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Maybe yes. But for this installation, I started in an new "objdir" > > and did a "make clean", if I remember correctly. Any suggestions what I > > could test here? > > Hmm... if the objdir was really new, you couldn't have done a 'make clean' > since there is no Makefile :-) > > My wild guess is that the objdir was not new and you previously built with > Java support enabled. Then you did 'make clean', re-configured but some > scraps were left. I tested that this morning (even with 'make distclean') and > I got a failure when building libjava too. > > I presume you managed to build the compiler anyway, using another fresh new > objdir? Thank you for your effort. It is a while ago that I had this problem, and I had been busy with other things since, so I didn't try again. It is well possible that your guess is right. I have not yet tried again, since my gcc 3.2 is working fine. Actually I have removed the installation directory in the meantime in some cleanup process. I think I will try again only if (1) I really need 3.2.2, or (2) a new version appears, or (3) there are additional tests I could do to assist your debugging. With best greetings Gerhard Heinzel
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 14:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-04-17 14:26 Gerhard Heinzel [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-04-17 14:37 ebotcazou 2003-04-17 14:36 Eric Botcazou 2003-04-17 14:16 Eric Botcazou 2003-04-17 13:36 Gerhard Heinzel 2003-04-17 13:22 ebotcazou 2003-03-08 20:56 ghh
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030417142600.28698.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=ghh@mpq.mpg.de \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).