From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12212 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2003 01:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12183 invoked by uid 48); 19 Apr 2003 01:06:26 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030419010626.12182.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bero@arklinux.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, bero@arklinux.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10436: Taking address of casted value gives error X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00854.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Taking address of casted value gives error State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 19 01:06:25 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug - the two are not equivalent; in one you're taking the address of an lvalue, in the other you're not. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10436