From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33308-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2515 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2003 17:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2500 invoked by uid 71); 20 Apr 2003 17:56:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030420175601.2499.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9847; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <rassahah@neofonie.de>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:47:55 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=9847
 
 Why is this listed as 3.4 regression? I get "confused by earlier errors" on
 3.3, which means ICE if compiled with self-check. I think it's a 3.3/3.4
 regression, on error recovery.
 
 Giovanni Bajo