From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30958 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2003 14:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30944 invoked by uid 71); 21 Apr 2003 14:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030421143601.30943.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/10446: ICE on a definition of a nonexistent member function of a nested class in a class template Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00891.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10446; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10446: ICE on a definition of a nonexistent member function of a nested class in a class template Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:26:49 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=10446 Confirmed. It's an ICE on error recovery, present on 3.2/3.3/3.4. I rate this as a regression since 2.95 was correctly recovering. Giovanni Bajo