From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33340-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31518 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2003 22:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31503 invoked by uid 71); 21 Apr 2003 22:36:00 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030421223600.31502.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00910.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10423; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: dberger@motorola.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:30:17 -0700

 On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:03:20AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
 > (to the list:) How about we remove these options from 3.2.3 and 3.3 as
 > well?  It does not help anyone for them to be present but nonfunctional.
 
 Um, sure.
 
 
 r~