public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: target/10440: [cygwin] incorrect assembler produced (as fails with "is already defined")
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030422135600.3043.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR target/10440; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <mlt@bredband.net>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: target/10440: [cygwin] incorrect assembler produced (as fails with "is already defined")
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:52:59 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=10440
 
 Reduced snippet is:
 --------------------------------
 typedef struct
 {
    int dummy;
 } Foo;
 
 __attribute__((dllimport)) Foo issue_error_1;
 __attribute__((dllimport)) Foo issue_error_2;
 __attribute__((dllimport)) Foo issue_error_3;
 __attribute__((dllimport)) Foo f;
 
 void func(void)
 {
     other_func(f);
 }
 
 Foo f = {};
 --------------------------------
 /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/IMPOST~1/Temp/ccHvVfGR.s: Assembler messages:
 /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/IMPOST~1/Temp/ccHvVfGR.s:21: Error: symbol
 `_D' is already defined
 /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/IMPOST~1/Temp/ccHvVfGR.s:22: Error: symbol
 `_D' is already defined
 /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/IMPOST~1/Temp/ccHvVfGR.s:23: Error: symbol
 `_D' is already defined
 
 Funny thing is that we get one error for each symbol we declare above (I
 declared 3 and got three errors).
 
 This bug is a regression of the 3.2 branch only. It's fixed on 3.3 and 3.4
 with Mark's patch for pr/7910, but I read that the patch has been reverted.
 I did not understand though if another patch has been prepared or not. GCC
 3.3 build from a CVS snapshot of yesterday can compile it correctly.
 
 Giovanni Bajo
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-22 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-22 13:56 Giovanni Bajo [this message]
2003-04-22 23:06 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030422135600.3043.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=giovannibajo@libero.it \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).