From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7409 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2003 23:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7389 invoked by uid 71); 22 Apr 2003 23:56:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030422235601.7382.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Geoffrey Keating Subject: Re: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Reply-To: Geoffrey Keating X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00948.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10315; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Geoffrey Keating To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, adconrad@0c3.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, 186299@bugs.debian.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:52:14 -0700 I'm not sure why this insn isn't being recognised, it should be a 'movdf_hardfloat32'. It's a valid machine instruction if pseudo-register 311 happens to be allocated to a pair of integer registers. -- Geoff Keating