From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31577 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 03:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31555 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2003 03:59:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 03:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030423035948.31554.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10457: exception specs vs. -fno-enforce-eh-specs X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00952.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: exception specs vs. -fno-enforce-eh-specs State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 23 03:59:48 2003 State-Changed-Why: Actually icc does the right thing. I need to add d.foo() in the try block, and then: %a.out caught St13runtime_error http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10457