From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33393-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10701 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 12:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10665 invoked by uid 71); 23 Apr 2003 12:56:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030423125600.10664.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Subject: Re: debug/6577: debug info of static const variables leads to undefined references
Reply-To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00962.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR debug/6577; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: debug/6577: debug info of static const variables leads to undefined references
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:54:26 +0200 (CEST)

 >     I don't have 3.1 around any more, but can't reproduce this
 >     with 3.2. Can you say whether this is also fixed on your
 >     system with a newer gcc?
 
 It is fixed on my current system with gcc-3.2 and binutils-2.13.90.0.16.
 You can close it.
 
 Bruno