From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33431-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21997 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 21:47:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21972 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2003 21:47:57 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030423214757.21971.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mgoodman@csua.berkeley.edu,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  mgoodman@csua.berkeley.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10468: Type interpreted as int& instead of const int&
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01001.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Type interpreted as int& instead of const int&

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 23 21:47:56 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Why should it be different than what gcc does? Can you
    point to a certain paragraph in the standard? I'd think
    gcc is right.
    
    Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10468