From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20911 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 22:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20896 invoked by uid 71); 23 Apr 2003 22:56:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030423225600.20895.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01004.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10315; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: David Edelsohn Cc: Geoff Keating , s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, adconrad@0c3.net, 186299@bugs.debian.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:50:43 -0700 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:09:59PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > GCC probably should not fall on its face when presented with this > type of error, but I am not sure who sure ensure a valid insn. > gen_move_insn() should not be called that late? This is the same as PR8300, which I am looking at today. r~