From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16940 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16904 invoked by uid 71); 24 Apr 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Resent-Date: 24 Apr 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20030424122600.16903.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, porten@kde.org Received: (qmail 13256 invoked by uid 48); 24 Apr 2003 12:18:43 -0000 Message-Id: <20030424121843.13254.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:26:00 -0000 From: porten@kde.org Reply-To: porten@kde.org To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: c/10480: Bogus warning about non-static const member X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01028.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 10480 >Category: c >Synopsis: Bogus warning about non-static const member >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 24 12:26:00 UTC 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Harri Porten >Release: gcc 3.2 >Organization: >Environment: i686-pc-linux-gnu >Description: When compiling this piece of code with -W static const struct { const char* const s; } f[] = { { "foo" }, { "bar" } }; the compiler emits the warning: foo.c:2: warning: non-static const member `const char* const ::s' in class without a constructor Under normal circumstances I think I do understand the warning. But in this particular case instances of the struct a) are initialized explictly b) can't be created by anywhere else because the struct is anonymous So I think the warning is not justified. Harri. >How-To-Repeat: gcc -W foo.c >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: