From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25262 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 16:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25243 invoked by uid 48); 24 Apr 2003 16:27:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030424162719.25242.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Alberto.Ribon@cern.ch, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, Alberto.Ribon@cern.ch, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10482: Optimized and debug binaries of same application give different results. X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01044.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Optimized and debug binaries of same application give different results. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 24 16:27:18 2003 State-Changed-Why: There are known bugs in gcc, but if you want us to fix any potential problem (or tell you that what you do is invoking undefined behavior and therefore not a bug in gcc), then I guess you will have to tell us a little more than just "it doesn't work". Please review http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for this purpose. It explains what we need. It also explains a couple of typical problems. Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10482