From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33497-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22767 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22742 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030425004601.22741.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c/10488: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01067.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/10488; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: David.Moore@intel.com
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10488: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:39:41 -0400

 Known bug, look at http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html for more 
 information.
 
 "C99 inline functions do not generate an external definition if 
 declared without extern, but do if declared with extern, the opposite 
 of GCC's handling of inline and extern inline.  This will probably 
 require existing glibc headers to be fixincluded."
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski