From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33509-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27293 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2003 03:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27275 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2003 03:36:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 03:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030425033601.27274.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/4490
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01079.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/4490; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/4490
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:31:41 -0700

 On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 07:43:29PM -0500, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 > What startles me with that one is that it is suspended. What is the reason 
 > for that?
 
 I use "suspended" for things we acknowledge are bugs, but
 have no plans to ever fix.
 
 
 r~