From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31203 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2003 17:36:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30206 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2003 17:36:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030425173604.30176.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Moore, David" Subject: RE: c/10489: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards Reply-To: "Moore, David" X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01114.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/10489; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Moore, David" To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: RE: c/10489: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:27:30 -0700 Oops. On my first attempt to submit this I thought the server had barfed so I backed up and resubmitted. As a result there are now two! My apologies. Please delete one. -----Original Message----- From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 5:36 PM To: David.Moore@intel.com Subject: Re: c/10489: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c/10489'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c >Responsible: unassigned >Synopsis: Implementation of extern inline is exactly backwards >Arrival-Date: Fri Apr 25 00:36:01 UTC 2003