From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27207 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2003 12:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27177 invoked by uid 71); 27 Apr 2003 12:16:01 -0000 Resent-Date: 27 Apr 2003 12:16:01 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20030427121601.27176.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, joachim.eibl@gmx.de Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, joachim.eibl@gmx.de Received: (qmail 24369 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2003 12:11:23 -0000 Message-Id: <20030427121123.24367.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:16:00 -0000 From: joachim.eibl@gmx.de Reply-To: joachim.eibl@gmx.de To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: joachim.eibl@gmx.de X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) X-GNATS-Notify: joachim.eibl@gmx.de Subject: c++/10512: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01207.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 10512 >Category: c++ >Synopsis: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sun Apr 27 12:16:01 UTC 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: joachim.eibl@gmx.de >Release: gdb 5.3 in combination with g++ 3.2 >Organization: >Environment: Suse 8.2, i586 >Description: This is not new, but I want to point out that these two bugs are related: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3187 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=267 In the little program below I want to place a breakpoint in the constructor via gdb. But it will never be called. The reason is that the binary contains the constructor function twice. The breakpoint will be set in the first function. But the second function is called. // File simpletest.cpp: g++ -g3 simpletest.cpp class A { public: A(); private: bool bFlag; int num; }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { A* pA = new A; return 0; } A::A() { bFlag = false; // Here I want to place a breakpoint num = 9; } It is visible even in the assembler output, created via g++ -S simpletest.cpp Both constructors are identical and follow behind each other. ... .globl _ZN1AC2Ev .type _ZN1AC2Ev, @function _ZN1AC2Ev: .LFB6: pushl %ebp .LCFI4: movl %esp, %ebp .LCFI5: movl 8(%ebp), %eax movb $0, (%eax) movl 8(%ebp), %eax movl $9, 4(%eax) popl %ebp ret .LFE6: .size _ZN1AC2Ev, .-_ZN1AC2Ev .align 2 .globl _ZN1AC1Ev .type _ZN1AC1Ev, @function _ZN1AC1Ev: .LFB8: pushl %ebp .LCFI6: movl %esp, %ebp .LCFI7: movl 8(%ebp), %eax movb $0, (%eax) movl 8(%ebp), %eax movl $9, 4(%eax) popl %ebp ret ... (I've also posted this message on the gdb-bugs-site.) >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: