From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33679-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31182 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 14:43:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31161 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2003 14:43:10 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:43:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030428144310.31160.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  obi@saftware.de
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, obi@saftware.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10515: [3.3/3.4 regression] problem when initializing a field in a union
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01249.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Old Synopsis: g++ 3.3 mixes up types when an initialized field in a union
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] problem when initializing a field in a union

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 14:43:10 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. Note that this requires compiling with the C++ front
    end. It compiles cleanly with 3.2.3, but not with 3.3 or
    3.4, so assuming legality of the code, this is a regression.
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10515